patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

County Spends $28M For High School Dropout Prevention, Recovery

How well is Montgomery County addressing the needs of its at-risk student population?

 

 

A report released last Tuesday by Montgomery County's Office of Legislative Oversight suggests that Montgomery County could be doing more to help its at-risk youth.

An average of 1,200 students, or 2.5 percent of enrollment, drop out of Montgomery County schools each year according to the report. But, despite the costs associated with prevention and recovery of dropout students in Montgomery County, there is no method to evaluate the success of the county's alternative education programs, such as how well students do if they return to their high school, whether they graduate, or whether they are prepared for college or work once they leave MCPS.

Average dropout rates for high schools ranged from 0.4 percent at Winston Churchill High School to 4.6 percent at Wheaton High School.

The county allocated nearly $26 million in FY11 to the prevention of dropout students, spanning eight programs and serving a total of 13,300 students, according to the OLO report. Some of those programs spend as much as $21,800 per student on dropout prevention services (view attached table from the OLO report).

But it appears even the programs meant to prevent students from dropping out are facing their own high rate of dropouts. These programs have dropout rates of their own ranging from 5.1percent to 31.8percent.

About 70 percent of those students who do drop out are assisted by six dropout recovery programs, which help students with GED preparation and testing and other post-secondary support. Six dropout recovery programs, administered by Montgomery College and the Department of Health and Human Services, served 861 youth at a cost of about $2.5 million in FY11.

These programs include Gateway to College, provided by Montgomery College, where dropouts and current students can work toward a high school diploma and an associate's degree simultaneously. Gateway enrolled 141 students in FY11 with a budget just over $935,000. Another program called Conservation Corps, provided through the Department of Health and Human Services, assists youth in job training and GED preparation while providing a stipend. The Conservation Corps enrolled 19 individuals in FY11, with a budget of $400,000. The FY12 approved budget for the Conservation Corps program drops to $200,000.

"No comprehensive data currently exist that quantify the demand for alternative education programs in the county," the report states. “Nor have any of the County-funded agencies evaluated the effectiveness of their alternative education programs to increase high school completion rates or to prepare youth for colleges and careers."

When asked about the evaluation of the county’s dropout programs, MCPS spokesman Dana Tofig said, “We are always open to recommendations on how we can improve how we serve all of our students and appreciate the information provided to us by the Office of Legislative Oversight. Alternative education is an important issue that we look forward to working on with the county and other agencies—including Montgomery College.”

 

What do you think the county could do to better serve high school dropout students? Should the county do more? Should it do less? Tell us in the comments.

Related Topics: Dropout Prevention, Job Training, Montgomery County Public Schools, Potomac Schools, and open government

dinah

12:03 pm on Wednesday, March 21, 2012

If the county had more school based mental health clinics (housed in regular health clinics to decrease stigma), less kids will get to the point of dropout. It is much more than just grades, it is mostly a mental health concern, family divorce or another traumatic situation in the young person's life, mental health or co-occuring substance abuse issue, LGBT youth or other cultural group not yet widely accepted......and so on. Reaching these youth early will go a long way to prevent school dropout. That is where the county should be putting its' money...not when they already drop out.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Pete

1:52 pm on Thursday, March 22, 2012

dinah please feel free to check out the Northwood High School Wellness Center it provides all that you mention and especially has created a space of inclusion for all youth and families.

Comment_arrow

RVN6768

3:12 pm on Thursday, March 22, 2012

Dinah, do you think it was more difficult to grow up in the 50's and 60's than now? Back then, kids did not drop out, becasue their parents would not allow it. Today, the present culture promotes single moms as if it is the way to be cool. How many of these drop outs come from father less homes? Unless you can get the adults involved with their children, you are throwing away the money.

Comment_arrow

jag

4:22 pm on Thursday, March 22, 2012

RVN6768, you honestly could not be more wrong if you tried. The dropout rate today is only a fraction of what it was in the 1950 and 1960. The entire premise of your rant is lacking common sense and factual knowledge.

Jeff Hawkins

1:57 pm on Wednesday, March 21, 2012

"there is no method to evaluate the success of the county's alternative education programs, such as how well students do if they return to their high school, whether they graduate, or whether they are prepared for college or work once they leave MCPS."

I find this hard to believe! It seems like basic "record keeping" to me and it's costing 28 MILLION!!
For God's sake at least be able to track and analyze the data (i.e the folks that the money is being spent on supposedly). Unless of course they don't want to for some reason........

Reply

JH

7:38 pm on Wednesday, March 21, 2012

This is just another waste of tax dollars. 28million dollars? Is there no end to the wasteful spending? Send the bill to the dysfunctional deadbeat parents.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jag

11:22 pm on Wednesday, March 21, 2012

JH, I'd love it if just once you actually supported one of your opinions instead of just whining about taxes 14,000 times a day. The county obviously thinks spending this money will result in a net positive $$ (I hope I don't need to explain to you why it's a good idea to have the county's children graduate from school). Or do you seriously think the county is just doing this to piss you off? Just once try to articulate a fact-based response on why you think the money isn't being well spent in this situation or articulate an idea of how the money should be spent to better solve the issue at hand (like dinah did with her interesting idea). I mean seriously, do you teapartiers have a daily whining quota to meet or something?

Comment_arrow

RVN6768

3:51 pm on Thursday, March 22, 2012

JH is right on. Schools should spend time teaching. Parents are necessary for guiding their off spring. Until parenting becomes important in this society again, we will continue to see politicians throwin away tax money at problems that cannot be solved by the school system.

JH

8:44 am on Thursday, March 22, 2012

I see we have some of the same far left liberals and Obama bots on this site. Freeloaders that cannot get enough public spending and deadbeat dads that don't want to be held accountable. You need to put down the bong and get a job.

Reply

Jewel Barlow

10:17 am on Thursday, March 22, 2012

I am suspicious of the effectiveness of the programs mentioned in this article based on the cost and population numbers given. Dinah's ideas seem plausible for some portion of the dropouts. My hypothesis would be that many of the cases involve young people whose families and likely many close acquaintances don't consider themselves to be part of the larger community that ultimately provides the rewards for following norms like graduating from high school. Such a disconnect would seem to be an aspect that needs to be addressed by other means than a school based program. It is a problem for all of us, not just the schools. The problem I have with embedding such programs in the school system is that it seems not to be the place to address the larger issues of which this may be a symptom, while providing a venue in which too much of the citizens' money taken by force (my opinion) is spent without definable benefits. I am in favor of the objective, but I am not convinced that Montgomery County and MCPS are good stewards of a considerable part of the tax money they require of us.

Reply

No Dropouts

2:53 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

When looking at the effectiveness of dropout recovery programs, it's important to compare apples to apples. Comparing dropout rates from traditional public schools to dropout rates from alternative recovery programs is like comparing cancer rates among the general population to cancer rates among those who have already had the disease once before.
For more information, please see our post on this issue at NoDropouts.org

Reply

Leave a comment