patching...
Breaking: Longshot Oxbow Wins Preakness Stakes »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

We Must Put an End to Racial Profiling in America

Racial profiling—the targeting of individuals because of race, ethnic identity, national origin or religion—has no place in our nation. The recent, tragic and avoidable shooting death of Trayvon Martin, an unarmed African-American teenager in Florida, has focused national attention on the need to make sure minority communities are protected from hate crimes and racial profiling, a practice that is ineffective in crime prevention, undermines effective law enforcement, and erodes civil rights.

The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution clearly states that “no State shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Last October, in keeping with the U.S. Constitution, I introduced legislation that would put an end to racial profiling and ensure that all Americans have “equal protection under the laws.”

My bill, the End Racial Profiling Act, S. 1670, would prohibit the use of racial profiling by federal, state or local law enforcement officials. It also would prohibit state and local law enforcement officials from using race as a factor in criminal investigations. It has the support of the NAACP, ACLU, the Rights Working Group and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights.

Racial profiling demonizes whole communities. Following the murder of Trayvon Martin, I met with members of Maryland’s faith and civil rights communities and heard about repeated incidents in which racial profiling has been used to target minorities for suspicion.

We must put an end to such targeting based on race or ethnic identity. I am pleased that the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation are investigating all the circumstances surrounding the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, including the investigation that was conducted by local authorities.

Maryland law enforcement has had problems with racial profiling. In the 1990s, the ACLU brought a class-action lawsuit against the Maryland State Police for illegally targeting African-American motorists for stops and searches along Maryland’s highways. The parties ultimately agreed that “the need to treat motorists of all races with respect, dignity and fairness under the law is fundamental to good police work and a just society … (and) that racial profiling is unlawful and undermines public safety …”

Racial profiling is not an effective policy and often saps scarce law enforcement resources that could be utilized more effectively. Minority communities—African Americans, Arabs, Muslims, Hispanic communities—know all too well the anger and frustration of being singled out because of their race, religion or ethnic origin. One of the major reasons racial profiling doesn’t work is because it corrodes public trust and makes it less likely that affected communities will voluntarily cooperate with law enforcement and community policing efforts.

It is time that we make clear that racial profiling has no place in law enforcement.

Joe Public

9:29 am on Saturday, March 31, 2012

I see our Senator has jumped on the bandwagon with our President, pre-judging events before our authorities - and avoiding comment of dozens of similar events occuring daily throughout the US. How brave and ill-informed!.

Reply

John Naughton

1:43 pm on Saturday, March 31, 2012

Cardin is not ill informed. He is a cheap politician trolling the bottom for votes.
He might be able to sink lower, but it is doubtful.

Reply

John Naughton

2:43 pm on Saturday, March 31, 2012

What will Cardin say about this? The behavior he is helping to incite.

7 CA boys arrested in attack on teen
AP: Mar 30, 2012

PALMDALE, Calif. (AP) - Seven black teens ages 13 -16 were arrested on suspicion of committing a hate crime when they attacked a 15-year-old Hispanic boy while he was walking home from school in Southern CA, according to the LA County Sheriff's Office.

The March 14 beating was captured on video and posted on YouTube, but has since been removed.

The video shows as many as 10 boys surrounding the victim and challenging him to a fight. The suspects then began hitting the teen while others watched.

During the beating, the teens made racially derogatory statements that were captured on the video, Ford said.

After the victim fell to the ground, the assailants kicked him multiple times in the head, knocked out several teeth and left shoe impressions on his skin, Ford said.

The victim was able to get to his feet and escape the onslaught, and will need to undergo dental surgery.

The teens who were arrested were identified from the video, which was discovered by a Palmdale sheriff's deputy and has been retained for evidence.
Police are seeking three more suspects.

Reply

John Naughton

2:45 pm on Saturday, March 31, 2012

Racial hate crimes are disgusting but cheap politicians like Cardin, trying to profit politically are worse.

Reply

Theresa Defino

3:33 pm on Saturday, March 31, 2012

Yes, he tried to "profit" by introducing a bill in Congress outlawing racial profiling.

Reply

John Naughton

5:24 pm on Saturday, March 31, 2012

Theresa,

If you read his article you will see he is calling the Trayson incident, "racial profiling." That is speculation, not fact at this point and Cardin has no business inflaming the situation. Despicable what he is doing. Will he reference the incident in CA which has much more evidence that it was a racila crime?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sharon Adams

12:36 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012

Cardin belongs in Florida with Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson...2 narcissists who crave 'public attention and accolades'! They too are using the fame (or their known infamy) to incite the masses who will do well to take a deep breath (during this entire very sad situation) & try to wait till investigation is complete. They (Sharpton & Jackson) too are speculating and merely 'lighting figurative fires' all across the country. And I would say from article that 'assuming' racial profiling is racial profiling on Cardin's part, ya think!!!!

Theresa Defino

9:20 pm on Saturday, March 31, 2012

Obviously I read it. Nope, he said "has focused national attention on the need to make sure minority communities are protected from hate crimes and racial profiling, a practice that is ineffective in crime prevention, undermines effective law enforcement, and erodes civil rights."

And he's right.

Also, I'm not responding to the rest of your flame-throwing and attempts to make illogical connections. I've seen your other comments on this site. I would not consider you objective about Sen. Cardin's actions, whatever they would be.

Reply

MocoLoco

11:13 pm on Saturday, March 31, 2012

This guy is a joke. He got the job as Senator because the Maryland Democrats decided it was "his turn." What he just wrote shows how dangerously shallow his thinking is. Is he accusing the Sanford Police Department of racial profiling? He mentions racial profiling (which he inexplicably defines to include profiling based on religion), but then gives the Trayvon shooting as an example. His bill only addresses racial profiling in law enforcement. Not even the professional race-baiters like Al "Tawana Brawley" Sharpton or Jesse "HymieTown" Jackson have accused the local police of racial profiling, have they? Isn't the focus on the shooter? How can a US Senator be so reckless and incendiary as to be accusing a local Florida police department of racial profiling when there seems to be no evidence whatsoever to support this?

Reply

John Naughton

11:14 am on Sunday, April 1, 2012

T,

Was there racial profiling in the in the Trayvon incident?

Reply

John Naughton

11:15 am on Sunday, April 1, 2012

T,

Was there racial profiling in the Trayvon incident?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Corbin Dallas Multipass

10:57 pm on Sunday, April 1, 2012

I though Zimmerman profiled Trayvon?

Comment_arrow

MocoLoco

8:11 am on Monday, April 2, 2012

CDM--That's the suggestion in the media. And, that's why Senator Cardin's use of the shooting to push for legislation that address something *totally* different (profiling by the police) is so outrageous and opportunistic. You may remember after 9/11, Eric Holder pushed for greater gun control--despite the fact that the terrorists used box cutters, not guns. Either Sen. Cardin thinks we're so stupid we won't notice the total disconnect between the event and his legislation, or he's so stupid that he doesn't see it himself. Looking at that goofy smile in his picture above, I'm not sure whether it is the former or the latter.

Comment_arrow

Corbin Dallas Multipass

9:18 am on Monday, April 2, 2012

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deborah-ramirez/posthumous-profiling-puzz_b_1387887.html

"many now wonder whether the Sanford Police posthumously profiled Trayvon as well by failing to conduct a thorough and professional investigation of his death."

Comment_arrow

MocoLoco

9:51 am on Monday, April 2, 2012

The authors of that article, both attorneys, say this: "The police must never be permitted to rely solely on the word of a killer without conducting a thorough investigation." Does *anyone* believe that police do this? That's laughable.

Comment_arrow

Corbin Dallas Multipass

10:51 am on Monday, April 2, 2012

I think they might do that with the pretense of an investigation that looks thorough from the outside but is hollow, yes. Police corruption exists.

Beside the point tho - the conversation of racial profiling by police in this case is ongoing, and Cardin's column addressing Maryland instances of profiling isn't that crazy.

Comment_arrow

Doug in Rockville

5:22 pm on Friday, April 13, 2012

It doesn't matter if there was profiling in the Trayvon Martin killing. The 9-1-1 operator instructed Mr. Zimmerman NOT to follow and stalk Mr. Martin, but he did it anyway. Would Mr. Zimmerman have done the same thing if Trayvon was a young white boy wearing a hoodie? Only he can answer that question. But none of this diminishes the fact that crimes are often intended to send a signal or terrorize specific communities. Enhanced penalties are completely appropriate in crimes where this occurs. If you're against hate crime penalties, then you're also against enhanced penalties and sentences for acts of terrorism, right?

Jeff Hawkins

7:47 am on Monday, April 2, 2012

Good old "My Friend Ben", always the opportunist.......

Reply

Robin Ficker

9:59 am on Monday, April 2, 2012

Thanks for your vote on Tuesday! Robin Ficker for Congress. I shall work hard for hard working voters!

Reply

Theresa Defino

10:29 am on Monday, April 2, 2012

^ Who is voting for Robin Ficker? Not me. Talk about opportunist!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Hawkins

10:42 am on Monday, April 2, 2012

Me neither..........

Cardin & Ficker? Two sides of the same coin......

Comment_arrow

Derek Hale

12:55 am on Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Flagged that one for Robin Ficker as inappropriate for Patch.

MocoLoco

11:05 am on Monday, April 2, 2012

Then flag his post as inappropriate.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Theresa Defino

11:56 am on Monday, April 2, 2012

Did as soon at it appeared. Has no impact.

John Naughton

11:20 am on Monday, April 2, 2012

When Cardin gets done stoking racial hatred, what is he going to do about the debt?

Just continue spending like the rest of the DEms?

Reply

brie

12:29 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012

Regardless of what side you are on there should have been due diligence instead of everyone playing amateur detective.

Reply

Fred

2:18 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012

MocoLoco wrote: "You may remember after 9/11, Eric Holder pushed for greater gun control--despite the fact that the terrorists used box cutters, not guns."

Really? Wasn't he in private practice at that time?

Reply

John Naughton

3:25 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012

And lets hope Holder and Cardin are in private practice on or before Jan 20, 2013.

It would help both,

Reply

Sharon Adams

11:39 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012

I commend those who make comments without personally attacking other commenters. It clearly demonstrates those who behave like adults, the bigger people.

Reply

Theresa Defino

11:44 pm on Monday, April 2, 2012

Yeah, y`all, let's NOT end racial profiling. DOH!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sharon Adams

12:30 am on Tuesday, April 3, 2012

I don't believe anybody is saying on this thread of comments that they are in any way against ending racial profiling. But, if that is your take or your interpretation, can't change that! I am vehemently against racial profiling. But a politician using Trayvon shooting as example {"tragic and avoidable shooting death of Trayvon Martin, an unarmed African-American teenager in Florida, has focused national attention on the need to make sure minority communities are protected from hate crimes and racial profiling...."}, I find rather disturbing. The investigation is not over {there as been too much 'trial & conviction' via the news media/public opinion) and yet the presumption of 'innocent till proven guilty' has seemingly been underminded even by Ben Cardin. That is scary! Here's hoping & praying this 'lynch-mob' mentality and prejudgement never comes knocking on our doors. Think I prefer what our system is supposed to be...trial by selected jury rather than vigilantes & emotional arsonist! Just sayin'!

Comment_arrow

Corbin Dallas Multipass

9:34 am on Tuesday, April 3, 2012

There's a national discussion going on about whether Trayvon Martin's case had any aspects of racial profiling. Ben Cardin uses that discussion to point out that racial profiling has existed in Maryland and that he's doing something about it. He's not judging anything by doing so. It's just him talking about the issue of racial profiling in the context of national discourse about racial profiling.

"Here's hoping & praying this 'lynch-mob' mentality and prejudgement never comes knocking on our doors."

Watch out, the Lynch mob mentality of Ben Cardin saying racial profiling is in the national discourse is coming to get ya.

John Naughton

11:14 am on Tuesday, April 3, 2012

A Holy and Happy Easter to all.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sharon Adams

1:02 pm on Tuesday, April 3, 2012

The same to you, John!!!!!

Sharon Adams

8:59 pm on Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Corbin, Cardin doesn't have lynch-mob mentality. I was referring to what is seems to be occurring in the 'general populace'. Cardin's genine concern & quest to alleviate profiling (of any sort) is admirable. But could have made point and drawn interest just as effectively without using Trayvon incident AS racial profiling implying somehow that has indeed been proven 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. I prefer to wait till 'jury is in'. And that will come if we all step back and give room (and time) for a thorough investigation. Justice will be served.

Reply

moe green

1:14 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012

racial profiling is good police work. seeing two black males in stevenson @3AM in a car registered to e.balto is a bright red flag.

ben cardin is a class A schmuck. a race hulstelr like jesse and revum al.

Reply

John Naughton

1:33 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012

Here is another example of what Cardin is helping to produce:

http://www.toledoblade.com/Police-Fire/2012/04/03/Man-78-recounts-assault-by-6-youths-in-E-Toledo.html

Six black youths beating a 78-year-old man in Toledo, Ohio in revenge for Trayvon's death.

Ben, you are the greatest. always telling the truth just like ABC, NBC, CNN and Obama. Are you going to wear a hoodie during your election campaign?

cc: Sen. Cardin

Reply
Comment_arrow

Corbin Dallas Multipass

3:04 pm on Thursday, April 12, 2012

It was 5 black kids and one white kid, and there's a lot of reason to believe that he was lying and/or exaggerating about other aspects of the story. http://www.toledoblade.com/Police-Fire/2012/04/07/Toledo-police-Man-s-account-of-assault-may-be-exaggerated.html

G Resident

11:44 am on Thursday, April 12, 2012

Based on all of the comments, I now know where the my children's classmates get their views. From their intolerant parents.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Hawkins

11:58 am on Thursday, April 12, 2012

@G
Not knowing if these folks on this thread even have children, let alone going to school with your children's classmates and shaping their views is an extreme "generalization" and no better than the "offending" original comments.

John Naughton

2:40 pm on Thursday, April 12, 2012

G,
Is "intolerant" the same as "injustice"? Sounds like that is your view.
Ben would look real good in a hoodie. He would do well to campaign in a hoodie?

Reply

jnrentz1

5:36 pm on Thursday, April 12, 2012

Has Senator Cardin ever condemned Black on White crime?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Corbin Dallas Multipass

5:44 pm on Thursday, April 12, 2012

That's under the umbrella of condemning all criminal activity, which I'm pretty sure he's on board with. Hate crime legislation almost always covers any cases where any criminal of any race specifically targets other individuals by race, so he does in fact condemn that by extension.

That's really a silly question.

Comment_arrow

jnrentz1

7:34 pm on Thursday, April 12, 2012

Corbin Dallas Multipass:

No. You are wrong, my question is not silly.

John Naughton

6:44 pm on Thursday, April 12, 2012

Corbin,

Hate crime legislation is generally directed to the protection of minorities.

It would be good to hear Ben say what you are assuming. His article which occasioned all these comments did not reflect what you are assuming. It was gutter politics. He doesn't deserve to be our senator.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Corbin Dallas Multipass

10:36 am on Friday, April 13, 2012

"Hate crime legislation is generally directed to the protection of minorities."

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c103:1:./temp/~c103rxLcxz:e927518:

"(a) DEFINITION- In this section, `hate crime' means a crime in which the defendant intentionally selects a victim, or in the case of a property crime, the property that is the object of the crime, because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, gender, disability, or sexual orientation of any person."

In the case of the above bill on Racial Profiling that Ben Cardin was citing, http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c112:1:./temp/~c112oPedrT:e2495: it defines Racial Profiling as:

"The term `racial profiling' means the practice of a law enforcement agent or agency relying, to any degree, on race, ethnicity, national origin, or religion in selecting which individual to subject to routine or spontaneous investigatory activities or in deciding upon the scope and substance of law enforcement activity following the initial investigatory procedure, except when there is trustworthy information, relevant to the locality and timeframe, that links a person of a particular race, ethnicity, national origin, or religion to an identified criminal incident or scheme."

Note in both places the term minority is never used.

Comment_arrow

Jeff Hawkins

9:08 am on Friday, April 13, 2012

Theresa,
I think that will have to be proved in Court, until then it's just the usual stuff. A prosecutors job is to win at all costs and will use all favorable words. I imagine the defense attorney will say NOT PROFILING.

John Naughton

11:40 am on Friday, April 13, 2012

T.
From the CBS report: (Can we trust CBS?)

"The affidavit, which is the prosecution's point of view in filing a second-degree murder charge against Zimmerman, presents the prosecution's answers to two questions that have been debated in the weeks since the shooting: ..."

Even if the prosecutor is factually correct, it doesn't justify Cardin's slime-ball politics calling it profiling before any authoritative statement. Even now he is not justified in calling it profiling until proven in court.

Have a great day!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Theresa Defino

9:08 am on Saturday, April 14, 2012

I said it was the prosecutor's view. And there are no slime ball politics involved in Cardin's support of his own bill--and as we've said before, he NEVER said there was racial profiling, he said the case was raising attention to the issue. Which it has.

And I am confident the prosecutor is correct. Too bad Travyon wasn't just a "normal white person," right, Frank!

123BOOM

12:44 pm on Friday, April 13, 2012

Defenders of profiling are quick to deny or deemphasize its racial component. They condemn profiling solely on the basis of race, but defend profiling by looking for signs that a person might be a lawbreaker as good police work. If blacks are being stopped and searched at a disproportionately high rate as compared to whites, they charge, it is because they commit a disproportionately high number of crimes. Defenders of profiling point to statistics that show, for example, that while blacks comprise only about 13 percent of the population, they make up 35 percent of all drug arrests and 55 percent of all drug convictions.

Reply

jnrentz1

4:32 pm on Friday, April 13, 2012

I think Hate Crime as a classification, with increased penalties are wrong. There are those on these pages that think otherwise.

For Montgomery County, does anyone know of any prosecution, in the past 10 years, of any minority for any Hate Crime in which the victim was/is an otherwise normal White person?

Reply

Joe Thomas

5:31 pm on Friday, April 13, 2012

This statement by Cardin just guaranteed that I will vote for someone else. He is a typical pandering politician who sees his chance to win the black vote. Has he introduced any bills that would prohibit the beating and robbing of the white guy in downtown Baltimore last week by a crowd of blacks? That video has been hushed up by the liberal media but it is available online.

Actually racial profiling is good police work. If an officer works in an area where 95% of the armed robberies have been committed by black males and he sees two black males enter a store at closing time while another remains behind the wheel would it be unlawful under Cardin's bill to keep the car under observation? Would it be unlawful for the officer to get out of his car and look in the store window?

Mr. Cardin you are a joke.

Reply

jnrentz1

6:11 pm on Friday, April 13, 2012

"Racial profiling—the targeting of individuals because of race, ethnic identity, national origin or religion—has no place in our nation. The recent, tragic and avoidable shooting death of Trayvon Martin, an unarmed African-American teenager in Florida, has focused national attention on the need to make sure minority communities are protected from hate crimes and racial profiling, a practice that is ineffective in crime prevention, undermines effective law enforcement, and erodes civil rights."

Senator Cardin,

What about White communities? Do they deserve to be protected from hate crimes and racial profiling?

Why did you single out minority communities? Do they deserve special protections, that non-minorties will be denied?

It seems to me that "equal protection under the laws" will be denied to many, to appease the few if your law is passed.

Reply

Leave a comment