.

Green Energy Boom, No More Pickpocketing: Candidates for Governor on Maryland's Economy

Maryland gubernatorial hopefuls had different views about what the state's economy needs.

Promoting the Port of Baltimore's new depth was one of the gubernatorial candidates' strategies for increasing economic activity. (Credit: Marge Neal)
Promoting the Port of Baltimore's new depth was one of the gubernatorial candidates' strategies for increasing economic activity. (Credit: Marge Neal)

By Mike Denison, CAPITAL NEWS SERVICE

All the major candidates for governor agree that Maryland’s business climate has room for improvement. But neither Democrats nor Republicans agree on how exactly this improvement will come about.

Democratic candidates see the state’s business landscape as a healthy environment with potential for growth, while Republican candidates see a wasteland wracked by government interference, according to their written responses to a Capital News Service candidate questionnaire.

The three major Democratic candidates all proposed government programs that would create new business opportunities.

Attorney General Doug Gansler’s plans highlighted the stark differences between Western Maryland, the Eastern Shore and the rest of the state.

"We should celebrate and build on each region’s strengths, not continue with a failed one-size-fits-all approach to bringing business to Maryland," he said.

To that end, Gansler proposed the formation of "academic manufacturing clusters," enticing businesses to work with flagship programs of nearby universities, such as using the University of Maryland Eastern Shore’s solar farm to lure green energy businesses.

“California has Silicon Valley with its universities; Maryland should have Security Valley, Renewable Shore and Medical Hill,” he said.

In addition to technology, environmental and health businesses, Lt. Gov. Anthony Brown emphasized the state’s transportation and distribution opportunities as potential job creators. He offered the proposed Red Line, which would connect several Baltimore neighborhoods via light rail, and the Purple Line, a proposed light rail running from New Carollton to Bethesda, as job creation opportunities that will also provide valuable infrastructure for existing businesses.

Brown was not troubled by Maryland’s connections to federal contractors, calling them a “significant economic benefit” and declaring intent to encourage federal partnerships in the future.

Gansler had a more negative view of the state’s reliance on federal jobs, citing the “big and needless” impact of the government shutdown as evidence.

“When planning for your future, the first thing they teach you is never put all your eggs in one basket,” he said. “The same goes when planning for our state’s future.”

The four major Republican gubernatorial candidates argued that an easy way to put more eggs in more baskets would be to repair what Delegate Ron George, R-Anne Arundel, called Maryland’s “terrible manufacturing reputation.” He proposed eliminating taxes on manufacturing equipment that are four times the national average.

“We have chased away the businesses with entry-level and mid-level jobs and with them, any hope of sustained long-term private sector growth,” he said.

Charles Lollar, a Charles County businessman, targeted even more taxes, saying the corporate income tax should be reduced by 40 percent, the so-called “rain tax” and gas tax should be eliminated outright, and “all specialized taxes” should be reviewed to determine their effect on state businesses. He also suggested that wasteful government entities could be eliminated, reducing the need for tax revenue.

“We need to stop picking the pockets of Marylanders to fund excessive government agencies and programs,” he said.

Harford County Executive David Craig also supported tax reform.

“Reforming Maryland’s tax structure and having less reliance on federal funding will poise the state to attract innovative businesses,” he said.

Craig also advocated a gradual reduction of the corporate income tax to 1.25 percent—which would tie Maryland with Kansas for the nation’s lowest—and aiding small businesses by eliminating the state income tax entirely.

Tax reform was not limited to Republican agendas. While she did not propose eliminating any business taxes, Delegate Heather Mizeur, D-Montgomery, proposed a $197 million tax rebate for small businesses so they could hire more workers, as well as a job training program to help companies fill skilled-labor gaps.

“By encouraging more growth in our already strong innovation economy, we can lead the nation into a new era,” said Mizeur, who singled out energy, biotech and cybersecurity as industries worth government attention.

Revamping the Port of Baltimore, a key focus of Republican platforms, was also on Brown’s agenda. He hopes that promoting the port will allow Maryland to become “the epicenter of distribution for the entire East Coast.”

Larry Hogan, a Republican candidate who is an Anne Arundel County real estate broker and the leader of the conservative action group Change Maryland, said the port’s ability to accommodate massive ships designed to fit through the upcoming wider version of the Panama Canal should be highly touted and used to attract more shipping activity. Currently, the only East Coast ports that can house such ships are Baltimore and Norfolk, according to businessfacilities.com, a business media organization.

Fueling the ongoing controversy over hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking” for natural gas, Lollar proposed exploiting the Maryland section of the Marcellus shale beds to create new jobs.

Gansler, however, focused on alternative energy, including a plan to create a facility that could convert chicken litter into fuel, allowing farmers to sell waste for profit while keeping the Chesapeake Bay clean. Brown said he would aim to create jobs with investments in offshore wind, solar energy, and state waterway protection.

The Maryland primary elections are June 24.

Read candidates' responses to questions about minimum wage, the economy, taxes, education, Maryland Health Exchange, marijuana and the environment here.

steven bradley April 16, 2014 at 04:11 PM
Bob, Sure I gave you an example that really has little to do with the overall economy. It does show the ridiculous amount of regulation that has to be dealt with as a small business owner. You are right in that I should have said it’s not all big bad businesses fault. That is what I meant when I said there is plenty of blame to go around. I certainly did not mean it was all the American consumers fault. You did not take that from it did you? If you think that government has been making it easy on small business, you need to look again. There isn’t any claptrap there my friend. I know you think that if the Republicans are run out of office, the Democrats would be able to raise everyone’s wage and stop big bad business from shipping work overseas. You need to take a look at what it takes to become a union member in the trades. They are certainly not helping the American workforce.
TJ April 16, 2014 at 04:14 PM
I'm a home improvement contractor and over the last 7 years after all the Billions spent in Maryland by O'Malley for the economy, I am way far worse off now. The problem, illegal's. I can't compete with contractors that use these day workers that pay under the table and none of them pay taxes. Md. uses 2 Billion each year of "OUR" tax money to support them which is caused by Doug Gansler not inforcing current law. They get our tax money, our jobs, another Billion in schooling and we get - screwed. You can contact EVERY Democrat and thank them for giving them a nice life style and forcing us to pay for it.
steven bradley April 16, 2014 at 04:16 PM
Chuck, big business is smart enough to know that if they are the only game in town you will be forced to buy their products and services. The more regulation the harder it is to get into the game. If you and Bob think big business is the ones calling for less regulation then you need to take a look at the big picture. Big bank is in bed with big business and big government. They want to control the money, the markets and your life. They can even stop you from pulling a rabbit out of a hat!!
Chuck Burton April 16, 2014 at 04:49 PM
Steven, ALL politicians love regulation. It gives them more of the power they yearn for - though they seldom have any idea how best to use it once they get it. ALL business and labor is as full of politicians as the government. They all want power over those they regard as mere subjects to be used for their own profit. Tell me in your heart you don't think of your customers in much that way - even if you want to do a good job and please them. That is the way to profit, after all; and we are ALL politicians to some degree and want to be in that .1% I mentioned earlier. I'm sure you love any regulation that supports your ambitions as much as you hate those that make things more difficult for you.
steven bradley April 16, 2014 at 06:13 PM
Chuck, that is a very cynical view. You think I look at my customers as subjects? I tend to look at them as people and try to deliver more than expected of me. I happen to like my customers and try not to work for those that I don’t like. I have no intention of living my life looking at people as my enemy. I share your view that most politicians seek control. There are few leaders, mostly appeasers buying control. Not all of everything ever applies. I’m more libertarian. Don’t drop a bomb on me or piss on me and tell me it’s raining. Otherwise you do your thing and I’ll do mine. We can help each other when our paths cross. If we do it makes both of our loads easier.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »